[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]


I don't recall if there was a color difference between the layers.  Memory (being what it is these days) seems to think it was about the same and my non-professional, non-geological impression was these layers were probably laid down by yearly flooding of the river (Virgin River), which is nearby.
The tail-drag imprint was very faint and if the volunteer at the site hadn't pointed it out I would have missed it.  I did take a picture but looking at it now, I can't pick out where the drag is.  Once again, relying on memory, I remember these as being slightly sickle shaped... one bent to the left, the other to the right as if the tail were in motion assisting the animals balance rather than a straight drag that might infer prey being dragged (as suggested as a possibility elsewhere).
I seem to recall the list now allows attachments (if not, forgive me), so I've attached a photo of the "drumstick" imprint.  Don't get too excited about the visible "claw".  Someone there thought it would be nice to have it for the tourists and made it out of cement.  Since these are natural casts of the imprint, the claw would actually be pointed the wrong way had it been real.
If I figure out where the tail drag picture is, I'll attach it in another email.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 2:49 PM

    Phil Brunette described:
    "...There are some very well preserved tracks and it appears to have been a site that the dino's visited often since there are multiple layers of impressions suggesting yearly visits.... or migrations perhaps?"
    It might be interesting to do a study to try and determine whether the several substrate levels where the dinosaurs walked have even the slightest of color difference -- as contrasts with layers in between -- that might suggest the specific time of year in which the deduced migrations might have occurred.  For example, in some palro-environments it it has been speculated that layers laid down in winter tend to be somewhat darker, perhaps due to deposition of vegetable matter now visible as a carbon residue.
    Did anyone notice color differences where the track-bearing substrates are visible in cross-section?  If so, did the tracks tend to predominate in darker or lighter layers? 
Phil further commented:
    "Of the 100s of footprints ranging...from several inches to about 18 inches... there were only two spots which might be tail drag.  They appear on one trackway cluster (many foot imprints of multiple animals) and within approx 8 feet of each other.  Maybe one animal with a broken tail or injured leg?"
    Phil (or others who have been there), did you notice whether the possible tail drag marks occur along the approximately central line of a trackway?  If so, the tail drag explanation becomes a lot more convincing, regardless of whether it was due to injury, sinking into mud, or whatever.  If not, then all bets are off.
    Ray Stanford

Attachment: Image009.jpg
Description: JPEG image