[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: well-lit dimosaurs
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
> Ray Stanford
> The article attributed to BBC News Online science editor Dr. David
> Whitehouse seems to have a glaring oversight:
> It says, "Measurements have been made on 100-million-year-old rock
> samples...Researchers say that besides possibly giving T. rex a better
> display of the Northern and Southern Lights..."
> Did researchers really say that (about T. rex)? I didn't know
> T. rex was
> that old! :)
> Deductively (because of the T. rex reference), the author seems to be
> presuming that the same magnetic intensity persisted at least through the
> end of the Cretaceous ('T. rex time'), yet no evidence to that effect is
> cited in the BBC News on-line article.
I think this is deducing way too far! The T. rex reference is in a
relatively artistic sentence ("...better display of Northern & Southern
Lights...") rather than in any direct quotation by the researchers. I
strongly suspect that the name "T. rex" was used because it is the best
known Cretaceous dinosaur: unfortunately, it is a LATEST Cretaceous
Not a single other phrase concerning the data or quotes from the researchers
implies suggestions on their part that the high intensity extended into C33
or later. (Incidentally, T. rex lived in C30n and died during C29r).
So I think that the use of the name T. rex was (inaccurate) artistic
> The Long Cretaceous Normal which Holtz mentions does not, to my
> knowledge, include T. rex's time period. Someone please correct me if I'm
> wrong on this.
No, it does not. I'm glad they didn't use a Jurassic dinosaur!
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: email@example.com
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796