[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: ABSRD BAND on Sinornithosaurus feathers
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
> In a message dated 3/15/01 10:20:24 AM EST, email@example.com writes:
> << If every stage in the
> evolution of a morphological structure has to be adaptive, then it is
> difficult to fathom how a simple hollow cylinder or a pine needle-like
> branching structure can be functional in an animal. >>
> As usual, they overlook the obvious solution to this conundrum:
> the feathers
> of Sinosauropteryx and some of the other Liaoning theropods are
> derived from
> more birdlike feathers such as those seen in the earlier Archaeopteryx.
Actually, they are ignoring something even more fundamental, which is the
actual way feathers develop in living birds. Prum, Brush, Maderson, Lucas,
Stettenheim, and others have done some excellent work on this subject: see,
&issue=04&page=0513 (Maderson & Albardi's contribution to the SICB Feather
Symposium). In particular, check out figure 4C. Feathers are really a lot
weirder than you think they are in the way they grow: a strange
conveyer-belt like mechanism that adds the accessory structures onto the
main shaft during development.
The model advocated by "Cal King" in the posting Ken Kinman provided would
be analgous to suggesting that mammalian molars formed by having a conical
tooth erupt, and then be whittled down (by what? Gnomes?) to the derived
shape after the tooth has emerged from the gumline.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796