[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
In a message dated 3/18/01 2:22:27 PM EST, email@example.com writes:
<< It might be a good idea to revise the definition of _Dinosauromorpha_
(currently Clade(_Dinosauria_ <-- _Pterosauria_)), too, since it would
also greatly expand if _Pterosauria_ were not included in _Archosauria_.
Clade(_Iguanodon bernissartensis_ <-- _Pterodactylus antiquus_,
_Crocodylus niloticus_) might be better. _Pterosauromorpha_ (currently
Clade(_Pterosauria_ <-- _Dinosauria)) may need revision, too, or it might
become a synonym of _Prolacertiformes_ (has this ever been defined?)
(which already might be a synonym of _Protorosauria_). >>
This is a nice dose of the problems inherent in being too inflexible with the
definitions of higher taxa.