[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Ken Kinman wrote:
> I would agree that something like Crocodylotarsi would be preferable to
> Pseudosuchia. However, Avemetatarsalia is probably at best the paraphyletic
> mother group that gave rise to Crocodylotarsi (not sister groups), and
> Avemetatarsalia may well turn out to be actually polyphyletic.
Not if phylogenetically defined as Clade(_Passer_, _Iguanodon_ <--
_Crocodylus_). It would be either monophyletic, or invalid in the unlikely
event that _Crocodylus_ falls inside Clade(_Passer_ + _Iguanodon_). If
_Pterosauria_ turn out not to belong, so be it.
> And I also agree that Ornithischia is preferable to Predentata,
> although I'm not particularly crazy about either one of them.
_Predentata_ is, in all fairness, a great name, since it sums up the one
trait completely unique to the group. But, yes, you really can't supplant
such a well-restablished name as _Ornithischia_, IMHO.
> I'm just crossing my fingers and hoping Phytodinosaura might be a good
> clade. Time will tell.
Even if it is, _Ornithischia_ should be a subclade of it. The definition
really should be changed to Clade(_Iguanodon_ <-- _Megalosaurus_,
_Saltasaurus_), or something similar. _Phytodinosauria_ could be
Clade(_Iguanodon_, _Saltasaurus_ <-- _Megalosaurus_) (invalid under most
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
Home Page <http://dinosauricon.com/keesey>
The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
personal <email@example.com> --> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
AOL Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Yahoo! Messenger <Mighty Odinn>