[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 NJPharris@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 3/18/01 6:30:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> > _Pterosauromorpha_ == Clade(_Pterodactylus_ <-- _Iguanodon_)
> Better make this Clade(_Pterodactylus_ <-- _Iguanodon_, _Megalosaurus_),
> since it has been suggested in the past that pterosaurs are closer to
> theropods than to ornithischians.
Really!? Well, why not? It fits the original definition of "all organisms
sharing more recent ancestry with Pterosauria than with Dinosauria"
better, anyway. (Since _Dinosauria_ can be defined as Clade(_Iguanodon_ +
BTW, I've read that somebody (I think it was Sereno) defined _Pterosauria_
as a node-based clade anchored on about a dozen genera. Does anyone know
what those genera are?
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
Home Page <http://dinosauricon.com/keesey>
The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
personal <email@example.com> --> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
AOL Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Yahoo! Messenger <Mighty Odinn>