[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: The Lizard of Oz
David Marjanovic wrote:
This implies that either bird ancestors dropped from low heights -- 2 m or
less, I guess -- or that they already had something to retard their
Both are possibly true. Feathers could serve to create drag, in addition to
their insulatory properties.
This _could_ explain the evolution of wing feathers
I think it does. Stability and control during leaping would select for
stiffer and more elaborate feathers on the forelimb (starting at the manus)
and perhaps on the end of the tail too. The feathers would have symmetrical
vanes. In other words, symmetrical remiges and rectrices evolved as
drag-creating devices. (I can't claim credit for this idea - it's part of
Garner et al.'s "Pouncing Proavis" model.)
(I prefer brooding for this),
Maybe they used them for brooding as well. Wonderfully versatile things,
but not that of feathers in general, IMHO, which would have to be
present _and_ quite long before this behaviour evolved.
To clarify: I never ever said that feathers FIRST evolved for drag.
Insulation came first, and was most likely the primordial function of
feathers. Their "fluffy" structure pre-adapted them for drag, useful in
gravity-assisted leaps (incipient parachuting). Then the feathers on the
forelimb and tail became longer and stiffer and wider. This design
pre-adapted the symmetrical vaned feathers for lift. The wing feathers then
became asymmetrical. Evolution of flight by successive exaptations.
Timothy J. Williams
Iowa State University
Ames IA 50014
Phone: 515 294 9233
Fax: 515 294 3163
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com