[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: energy wasteful terramegathermy (hooray) vs energy efficient gigantothermy (boo hiss)
A technical glitch prevented this from going straight to the list -- MPR
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 08:21:29 -0400
From: Graydon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: energy wasteful terramegathermy (hooray) vs energy efficient
gigantothermy (boo hiss)]
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 03:31:42AM -0400, email@example.com scripsit:
> Unless, of course, dinosaurs do represent these bradymetabolic/aerobic
> reptiles. Since no animal in the history of the planet, has ever gotten as
> large as the animals that came out of the Mesozoic, it makes for a highly
> debateable proposition (e.g. if mammalian metabolism is really required to
> reach sauropod sizes then how come the largest mammals we know of, barely hit
> mid sauropod size throughout their "dominance" of the planet?).
Structural limitations, there as side effects of being small for 120
Myears; no lumbar ribs, no cervical ribs, no pneumatic bones, no
option for neck-and-tail balance beam back structures, reliance on
jaws for mechanical food processing; there's enough differences in the
body plan to argue that sauropods are something of a special case,
preserving options not surviving in the mammal genome.
That the largest mammals are about the size of the largest
non-sauropds strikes me as the more interesting comparison, there;
sauropod morphology has something to do with the size they reached.
To maintain the end is to uphold the means.
------- End of forwarded message -------