[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
"Jura" (email@example.com) writes:
>Truly an interesting question, but before
>one decides to pin this gigantism on
>endothermy, let's also remember that
>140 million years of evolution has yet to
>produce a bird that even comes in at a tonne,
>much less a multitonne one; and birds are
>twice as metabolically active as mammals.
Sorry. I forget.
What is the primary argument in support of the
notion that dinosaurs were >not< endotherms?
I have five high-school students camping out here,
so I'm not functioning at full capacity.
John C. McLoughlin