[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
George was right: the paper on Cristatusaurus was published earlier the same
... so, which one would be a doubtful genera?
In a message dated 5/11/01 0:08:36 AM EST, email@example.com writes:
<< If they prove to be so, since Paul was the first one to give
the name to the dinosaur, I guess, Cristatusaurus won't be a valid name. >>
I think it's the other way round, a far as I can recall.
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1