[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dinosaurs vs. Therapsids
I think the best way to look at it is that therapsids got off to a
pretty good start, diversified in the mid-to-late Permian, and then
WHAMO---it was downhill from there.
The end-Permian extinction was the main blow. They were able to
rediversify somewhat, but other reptile groups were more successful in
recovering and competing with them. And they also had the added pressure of
competing with their own descendants (mammals) beginning in the Upper
Dinosaurs would have just added to their problems (not necessarily
their MAIN problem), so I wouldn't give too much credit to the dinosaurs.
And then the end-Triassic extinction decimated the poor therapsids again,
leaving only a family or two to muddle through the Jurassic, and at least
one genus hanging on into the Early Cretaceous (at least in Japan).
Their extreme bad luck started at the end of the Permian, well before
dinosaurs, and I was surprised to learn that they made it to the Early
Cretaceous. The only piece of good luck they had was when one therapsid
clade gave rise to the mammals in the Triassic. That's the only silver
lining in the sad history of therapsids during the Mesozoic.
From: Dave Hardenbrook <DaveH47@mindspring.com>
Subject: Dinosaurs vs. Therapsids
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 19:13:50 -0700
I'm preparing to give a speech on Therapsids and why the Dinosaurs
wrestled world dominion from them. My primary sources of research
are Robert Bakker's _Dinosaur Heresies_ and John McLoughlin's
_Synapsida_, which both discuss the anatomical advantages that
gave dinos the edge over our pre-mammalian ancestors. But I've seen
a couple of web pages that say this "Competitive Displacement"
theory has fallen into disfavor. Is this true? Would it be wrong
to say in my speech that dinosaurs had a competitive advantage over
therapsids? Even if a mass extinction swept away most therapsids
and opened the way for diversification of dinos (much as the K/T
extinctions turned the tables in favor of mammals), didn't dinos still
have to have the advantages Bakker and McLoughlin point out
in order to repress the diversification of mammals in the Mesozoic?
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com