[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Jurassic Park 4 (yes, four)



POOR DINOSAURS!!
                            Luc J. "Aspidel" BAILLY

----- Original Message -----
From: Ilja Nieuwland <ilja@mac.com>
To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: Jurassic Park 4 (yes, four)


> Well, there were some semi-decent sequel #4s: think of Lethal Weapon,
> Star Wars (where no. 4 was really no. 1 and no. 1 was really no. 4),
> Star Trek 4, Alien:resurrection and the fourth James Bond is the best of
> the lot (I refer to Goldfinger of course; if you don't count Casino
> Royale that would probably be Thunderball). So let's not give up hope on
> JP4 entirely yet.
>
> And, come to think of it, Police Academy 4 can hardly have been much
> worse than no. 1...
>
> Ilja
>
>
> On Monday, May 21, 2001, at 11:39 PM, christian farrell kammerer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 May 2001, Jordan Mallon wrote:
> >> And although I wouldn't mind seeing another fifty Jurassic Parks
> >> (can't get
> >> enough of those dinosaurs), surely four films might be pushing it.  I
> >> mean,
> >> how many times can you visit a dino-infested island before realizing
> >> that
> >> you shouldn't go back? :P
> >
> > Hey, they made Jaws 4, even though Jaws 3-D probably didn't have nearly
> > as
> > much box office clout as JP3 will likely have. Now, if made, JP4 will
> > probably be of similar quality to a Jaws or Superman 4, but that's just
> > part of the curse of sequels.
> >
> > -Christian Kammerer
> >
>