[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]


In a message dated 5/22/01 3:44:39 PM, david.marjanovic@gmx.at writes:

<< Yes, but it doesn't appear at the mentioned site. May it have turned out to

be Paleocene? (I seem to recall that it is a misinterpretation of a

non-crown-group eutherian, but I have nothing to confirm this, it could be a

false memory...) >>

Well, someone out there would know...and besides, the first Protoungulatum 
was found in the '40s and the teeth were very common. They wouldn't change 
the name, anyway.

eric l.