[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Longipteryx chaoyangensis (Aves, Enantiornithes?)
> >>If it appears to be a (flight capable) bird from the skeleton, and
> preserved with integument, but the preservation shows it as "fuzz", is
> possible that what we have is the decayed remains of flight-capable=20
> feathers? That "fuzz" is one of the less well preserved modes for
> It may be that fuzz is simply the most common body integument to be
> Perhaps contour and flight feathers tend to be stripped from the body
AFAIK, the opposite tends to happen in recent dead birds -- the wing & tail
feathers stay in place longest. This was used to explain why ?some
*Archaeopteryx* specimens ?lack contour feathers.
> (this thing fell into a river, right?)
Well, a lake, AFAIK.
> , leaving only the isulatory (is
> that a word?) fuzz behind.
I've read "insulatory" quite often. :-)