[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dino placements...
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Jaime A. Headden wrote:
> Mickey Mortimer (Mickey_Mortimer11@email.msn.com) wrote:
> <Why the complete lack of resolution in the Enigmosauria?>
> Because the group has not been named, and is pretty much an internet name
> for the time being.
> Such names should be used in quotes or implied only. There is no taxonomic
> validity (read:
> conventions of naming rules) to "Enigmosauria" as yet. When you can find the
> name in print, I will
> use it. Besides, there's an alternate, less controversial name for this group
> out there without
> being internet chatter. Be patient -- :).
As mentioned on the list, it has been published in _Dinosaurs of the Isle
of Wight_. Only in a caption to an illustrated cladogram and in the index,
and without any further sort of description, it's true.
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
personal <firstname.lastname@example.org> --> <email@example.com>
AOL Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Yahoo! Messenger <Mighty Odinn>