[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: "Lazarus" Dinosaurs in the Paleocene!!?
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Ken Kinman wrote:
> First, it would probably be best to continue calling them "Lazarus"
> dinosaurs, and not abbreviated as "Lazarosaurs". Otherwise it may generate
> confusion with the non-dinosaurian genus Lazarussaurus (which were primitive
> choristoderes or choristodere relatives).
A nitpick here, it's actually _Lazarussuchus_, but I agree with your
point, especially since it would be unfortunate if the name
"Lazarosaurus" starting popping up on various genera lists and the like.