[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: evolution of theropod wrist motion

> In a message dated 11/19/01 8:46:34 PM EST, jnorton@une.edu writes:
> If the BCF folks are correct, and theropod dinosaurs are the secondarily
> flightless descendents of early feathered flyers, wouldn't there have been
> enough evolutionary time between the earliest theropods and Deinonychus, for
> example, for theropods to have regained the wrist mobility one would expect
> in a ground-based predator?  Wouldn't the ability to rotate, pronate,
> supinate, adduct and abduct the wrist have been enough of an advantage in
> prey capture to reverse the early flight-stroke adaptations?  Why would the
> limited wrist mobility persist?

If BCF folks are incorrect, then why would _Deinonychus_ even have limited
wrist mobility?

Both models require that limited wrist mobility be somehow advantageous to
a terrestrial animal -- it's not something that BCF alone must explain.

 The Dinosauricon        <http://dinosauricon.com>
  BloodySteak             <http://www.bloodysteak.com>
   personal                <keesey@bigfoot.com> --> <tmk@dinosauricon.com>
    Dinosauricon-related    <dinosaur@dinosauricon.com>
     AOL Instant Messenger   <Ric Blayze>
      ICQ                     <77314901>
       Yahoo! Messenger        <Mighty Odinn>