[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Tsagantsabian age
From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <email@example.com>
Subject: RE: the last stegosaur
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:45:22 -0400
> >In answer to your question, though, Wuerhosaurus was once
> considered to be
> >the latest-occuring stegosaur, but new (as you note) new data
> indicate that
> >it could be older than the Wealden stegosaur material.
> What new data? Shuvalov wrote that Tsagantsabian sediments had
> begun to accumulate by the end of the late Jurassic, which
> suggests an early
> EK age for Wuerhosaurus. Does other new data confirm this?
The Shuvalov work IS the new data (compared to older work).
I notice there are at least two units of EK age underlying the
Lianmuqin-presumably the basis for the old estimate of a late EK age for
Wuerhosaurus. Shuvalov showed that Tsagantsabian datable materials from
Mongolia have yielded ages of about 130 Ma, so maybe Wuerhosaurus, from the
correlative Lianmuqin, was neither very early nor late in the EK but of c
Hauterivian age. I don't know if that's older than the Wealden- probably
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.