[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Pterosaur wings clarification (quite long)



This is a good post.  I particularly agree with the two following
comments.  Don't be done, Dave.  Everything you say is always worth
listening to and of very serious consideration, whether all of us agree
with all of it, or not.
Jim

Unwin wrote:
> 
> Perhaps 'coupled' pertaining to a brachiopatagium attached to the hind limbs 
> and 'uncoupled', pertaining to a free hind limb might be better?.
> 
>Certainly, they may have been able to stand for brief periods on their feet 
>alone, but this was probably highly unstable irrespective of how one orients 
>the spinal column, and they either fell over, took off, or resorted to all 
>fours.