[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: pterosaurs, bats, flying theropods & aegyptiacus

BECAUSE:1) "b***", like "f***", is a four-letter word
I choose not to utilize in discourse, even in plural
form; because 2) I categorially reject the mentality
that sees "b***s" as "special", when, in fact, they
are nothing more than feathered reptiles, living
dinosaurs, no more special phylogenetically than
pre-K/T taxa. Thus, I favour abandonment of Nomina
Anatomica Avium, absorbing it into Biology of the
Reptilia's anatomical nomenclature. And it matters
zilch if one opts for the adjective "professional" or
not: I choose, as a matter of principle, to apply the
perfectly appropriate words of "living dinosaurs",
"flying theropods", to the extant taxa you like to
call "b***s". To use the latter may be something you,
and others, like to use, but there are those who
believe "b***s" are descendents of lizards or other
taxa and are not dinosaurs...causing me to wonder, in
moments of light humour, such as this very moment, if
they are in need of colonic showers so that one can
abandon the hyphen in retentive! And so...I believe
the 9000+/- spp. of living, volant, extant theropods
are deserving of being something more than for the
--- aegyptiacus@aol.com wrote:
> Again and again, the same refrain. No personnal
> thing, here, but, really : this list is composed of
> (mainly, I think) professionals. Within is a tiny
> bit of laymen (and women). We all are convinced (or
> nearly) that birds are BAD -or BADD- even us, simple
> laymen (and women). What's the use of keeping saying
> "extant dinosaurs, flying theropods" and so on.
> There's only 5 letters in "birds" and it's a good
> word for ALL extant dinosaurs, or feathered
> osteolepiforms or whatever you like. Sorry, but it's
> a bit tiring. All of us on this list know of the
> bird-dinosaur relationship, even if some don't agree
> with the majority (that's their right). Call birds
> "birds", as long as extant dinosaurs are concerned,
> please. Today, there's no question about the name
> (call them avians, avialeans, ornithurans,
> euornithines, neoavians (why not), and if that's not
> enough, feathered osteolepiforms, volant
> whateveriids (an idea)). Yes, we, non-scientists,
> know the relation between birds and dinosaurs
> (whatever one think of the kindof relation).So,
> please, when you talk about extinct forms, chose the
> word you want, and when you speak about living
> forms, call them birds : there's nothing wrong about
> that.
> Sorry
> I couldn't resist
> Cheers anyway (as always)
> Jean-Michel
> BTW : merry Christmas to you all

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.