[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Birds and pornography

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Birds and pornography
From: "Ken Kinman" <kinman@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 00:33:10
Reply-to: kinman@hotmail.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

And if so, it is just one more reason that these closer coelurosaurs should be classified as birds. The cladistic definition may eventually *force* cladists to include maniraptors in Aves!! The closer the eclectic Aves (apomorphy-based) and cladistic Aves end up in content, the better off we will all be once the dust has settled. Anyway, I am really looking forward to Greg Paul's book. ------ Cheers, Ken **************************************** David Marjanovic wrote:

And Thulborn (1984) and HP Paul (PDW, 1988, SVP meeting abstract, 2001, and Dinosaurs of the Air, in press), who think that other coelurosaurs are closer to Ornithurae/Ornithothoraces/Pygostylia than Archie.

_________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Birds and pornography
  - From: Graydon <graydon@dsl.ca>
- Re: Birds and pornography
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: handedness in dinosaurs/"birds"
Next by Date: Re: Fwd: feathered pterosaur???
Previous by thread: Re: handedness in dinosaurs/"birds"
Next by thread: Re: Birds and pornography
Indexes: