[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: "Megapnosaurus" says farewell...
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Rob Gay wrote:
> Now now now...we all here onlist know that I, more than possibly anyone else
> onlist, think that these two genera should be synonymous...but sinking one
> name into another should be based on science, not aesthetics...
Too bad there is no real scientific method for determining what belongs to
a genus. Of course, it is a bad idea to sink a name based on whether you
like it or not (and Gregory Paul did sink _Syntarsus_ Raath 1969 into
_Coelophysis_ because he felt it was similar enough, not because he
disliked the name _Syntarsus_), but in the end, it's still a subjective
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
personal <firstname.lastname@example.org> --> <email@example.com>
AOL Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Yahoo! Messenger <Mighty Odinn>