[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

W4MA (Wait for Mickey's Analysis)

Dear All,
Well, I must admit the character distribution is even more muddled than I thought (those darn coelurosaurs). ;-) And I am now looking forward to Mickey's analysis with even more anticipation. Please remember that I am a strong believer in cladistic analysis (and was therefore a little stunned on Thursday when Jaime seemed to be lumping me into the same category as Feduccia).
I would much rather be viewed as Sereno-esque (a term Mickey used last weekend). I don't like Sereno's nomenclatural philosophy at all, but I think his analytical approach does have some definite advantages (in spite of the fact that I disagree with his placement of tyrannosaurs). He may have done better with more accurate codings.
Anyway, I still think a paraphyletic Enigmosauria and a polyphyletic Alvarezsauria are still likely alternative hypotheses, and that Mickey's analysis will probably show support for one or both of them (even if they end up occurring in trees that are a few steps longer). If my hypotheses are too unparsimonious, I'll shut up. We shall see.
In the meantime, I will do my hypothesizing on those particular topics offlist (and I am sure that has a lot of people applauding).
Cheers, Ken

_________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com