|
Stephen Pickering
wrote-
> I remember vividly the media
hoopla over the Egyptian sauropod based upon > fragments, which is Sauropoda
indet., should not have been given a name, etc.
If you're talking about Paralititan, it's far more
diagnostic than Sauropoda indet.. At least you could have said
Titanosauridae indet.. This myth that fragmentary remains can never be
diagnostic is irritating.
Mickey Mortimer
|