[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Gauthier & de Quieroz et al.

Stephen Pickering wrote-
> I remember vividly the media hoopla over the Egyptian sauropod based upon > fragments, which is Sauropoda indet., should not have been given a name, etc.
If you're talking about Paralititan, it's far more diagnostic than Sauropoda indet..  At least you could have said Titanosauridae indet..  This myth that fragmentary remains can never be diagnostic is irritating.
Mickey Mortimer