[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
footprint fallacies (was "Large theropod speed record")
Title: footprint fallacies (was "Large theropod
speed record
Reading the
recent news on the new dinosaur tracks in the UK got me wondering.
What is the current trackway evidence for large
theropods?
er....there IS trackway evidence of large theropods :-)
which means they probably walked around, at least some of the
time. (At least, trackways indicate that large theropods didn't all
fly, or swing from treetop to treetop...)
I am
aware of only two trackways of running large theropods, this recent
British study quotes 30 km/hour and Kuban, 1989, quotes 36 km/hr for a
trackway in Glen Rose, Texas.
Right. And as we all know,
speed = distance/time.
And of course, we know exactly how long it took for the dinosaur
in question to cover the ground and make that trackway....
oh wait, no we don't. Darn, can someone invent time travel
please?
Please please please - while dino tracks are really cool, and
give us lots of interesting info, we can NOT - and never will be
able to - tell the ACTUAL speed at which they were moving when
they left a particular trackway. The figures given in various articles
should be taken with a liberal sprinkling of salt. At best, we can
estimate the "relative" speed - and say something along the
lines of 'dino A was moving twice as fast as dino B'. But even then,
you can only compare two critters of the same size and taxon.
emma