[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: New papers in Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
> On the contrary, I think therizinosaurs branching off between
> dromaeosaurs and Archaeopteryx is extremely unlikely.
So do I, even though I can't find much to say against Enigmosauria. A
sister-group relationship of *Archaeopteryx* and "dromaeosaurs" definitely
sounds better than having segnosaurs in between. Looks like they use few
characters on the whole. Well.
> P.S. It is a shame that troodonts, mononykiforms, and enaniornithines
> weren't included.
Definitely. Though without *Sinovenator* the character states for
troodontids would have been wrong anyway :-)
> I can hardly W4MA.