[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: What happens if we purposely make a taxon non-eponymous?

I don't think people usually make taxa non-eponymous on purpose. It just happens. Siphonophora is a genus of millipedes, but also Order Siphonophora is used for hydrozoan "siphonophores". The problem was just basically ignored until 1994 when I proposed the eponymous Order Physophorida for the cnidarian siphonophores. Furthermore, as it turned out, the diplopod Order Siphonophorida was sunk into Order Typhlogenida, so the possibility of confusion seems to be minimal even without any ICZN action. How PhyloCode will deal with this (since cladists recognize such large numbers of intermediate taxa) is their problem. I never got an answer to this when I posed it to the PhyloCode list last year.
As for Ornithosuchia, I believe Ornithosuchus will end up back in that taxon, so not too worried about that one (even less so since it is an intermediate taxon which I would just code as an informal "ornithosuchian" clade anyway).
I certainly think Phylocoders are wise in avoiding typified names which are not anchored on the eponymous genera. However, I think this is far from being among their more serious problems. Like Benton, I don't see how all their problems can be overcome, and they are pushing an unmanagably large boulder up an extremely steep incline. I personally think it is an exercise in futility, but I guess a lot of people think some of my goals are futile as well. Only time will tell which boulder is really the most unmanagable. Either way, there are no easy answers.
----- Ken
Mickey Mortimer wrote:
Subject: What happens if we purposely make a taxon non-eponymous?
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:40:17 -0800

For instance, say I name a non-neoceratosaur "Neoceratosaurus", a non-sauropod "Sauropus" or a non-marginocephalian "Marginocephale". This makes the clade non-eponymous, which isn't allowed. But the ICZN can't reject my name for that reason. Will that force the renaming of the clades in question (sure to piss a lot of people off), or could you petition the ICZN for another genus name? Or would people just put up with it because the clades weren't named after the genus?

Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com