[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: FEATHERS FOR T-REX?
> This is kind of what I meant. I used the name "Maniraptoriformes" for
> clade; I know it isn't the definition, but it approximates the content.
What about Coelurosauria?
> In any case, I think we may be splitting hairs (or protofeathers) here.
Just to destroy the pun, protofeathers were probably split, or rather
branched, according to the newest *Sinosauropteryx* paper.
> >Whether certain
> >clades (_Tyrannosauroidea_, _Ornithomimosauria_, etc.) belong to that
> >clade or not is currently unresolved.
> Depends which paper you consult, I guess.
That's why he wrote "unresolved", I guess. :-)