[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: FEATHERS FOR T-REX?
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Williams, Tim wrote:
> This is kind of what I meant. I used the name "Maniraptoriformes" for this
> clade; I know it isn't the definition, but it approximates the content. In
> which case, it isn't a big assumption - although, perhaps a minor
> assumption, since it assumes that _Sinosauropteryx prima_ is a basal
They'd only be equivalent if _Sinosauropteryx_ were an arctometatarsalian
-- something I've never seen proposed. I guess they're close, tho'.
AFAIK, Clade(_Sinosauropteryx_ + _Vultur_) may be within _Maniraptora_
(virtually identical to it, tho') or it may include _Maniraptoriformes_.
> In any case, I think we may be splitting hairs (or protofeathers) here.
This is the DML, after all. :)
> The alvarezsaurids may lie closer to the base of the Maniraptoriformes
> than _Sinosauropteryx_
Who proposed that?
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
personal <email@example.com> --> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
AOL Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Yahoo! Messenger <Mighty Odinn>