[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Nomum Indecorum
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Mike Taylor wrote:
> > As you know, 'Scrotum humanum' is a nomen oblitum for Megalosaurus,
> > and a dinosaur was named 'Irritator', showing that there is a
> > certain laxity to nomenclature nowadays.
Apparently _Scrotum humanum_ was never intended as a scientific binomen,
just a descriptive phrase.
> > So if (for example)the people who described Tsintaosaurus had called
> > it 'Phallocephalas' (dickhead) would that name be overruled for
> > being too rude?
IIRC, there's a mushroom called _Phallus impudicus_, so....
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
personal <email@example.com> --> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
AOL Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Yahoo! Messenger <Mighty Odinn>