[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Regarding Spinosaurus
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Steve Brusatte wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:12:40
> Graydon wrote:
> >> Interesting idea. I wish Marco Mendez was still onlist, as I'm sure
> >> he would have something to say. I'll have to e-mail him later.
> >> Anyway, I like this idea. Boy, it would sure throw a kink into
> >> Horner's hypotheses (wouldn't it be funny if his big, mean JPIII
> >> Spinosaurus turned out to be a scavenger and Tyrannosaurus a predator?
> >> :-))
> >Not a scavenger; a peculiar predator.
> >(But funny anyway, I think.)
> Oh, sure. I was just being facetious. I have a really hard time accepting
> that any animal _that_ large could be an obligate scavenger.
Yes and no, consider the size of the animals it would be feeding on. A
dead sauropod would be quite a mountain of dead meat.