[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
In a message dated 1/27/02 1:58:52 PM Pacific Standard Time,
<< > And if a species can belong to two different clades across a clade
> naming clades is pointless.
The long and short of it is that taxa are bins into which species are
pigeonholed. If a species is pigeonholed into two distinct clades (such that
neither clade includes the other), then we haven't classified the species.