[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Thanks for the PDW summary! I just wanted to clarify one point.
--- Sean Carroll <email@example.com> wrote:
> He first set up the 'Intertheropoda', a group intermediate between the
> Ceratosauria and the 'Avetheropoda' (roughly equivalent to the
_Avetheropoda_ is not equivalent to _Tetanurae_; it is equivalent to
_Neotetanurae_. _Tetanurae_ is a broader stem-based clade descending from the
first ancestor of modern birds which was not also an ancestor of
_Ceratosaurus_; it includes _Megalosaurus_, _Spinosauridae_, etc. while
_Avetheropoda/Neotetanurae_ does not. Holtz 1994 used Paul's _Avetheropoda_ for
Clade(_Allosaurus_ + modern birds). In his phylogeny it had the same content as
Paul's taxon, but a different internal topology. Sereno et al. 1994 (which I
believe was just barely published earlier) used _Neotetanurae_ for the exact
same clade. Which term you use depends on whether you want to follow seniority
of nomination or of phylogenetic definition.
=====> T. Michael Keesey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
=====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
=====> BloodySteak <http://bloodysteak.com>
=====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better