[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: the last stegosaur
From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: RE: the last stegosaur
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 09:32:21 -0400
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
> Tim Donovan
> Which stegosaur was the youngest? Wuerhosaurus was of
> Tsagantsabian age, and
> may have been pre-Barremian. I notice stegosaurs were not included in
> faunal list for the Mazongshan unit of Barremian age. But
> Katsuyamakensaurus is supposedly of Barremian-Aptian age. Is
> that cerdible?
Given that no material has yet to be published, described, and even (as far
as I can remember) even photographed and put on the web concerning the
informal taxon "Katsuyamenryu" (aka "Katsuyamekensaurus"), it has
(currently) unverifiable credibility... Furthermore, if (for example) this
was based soley on teeth, or on isolated conical plates, it could very well
be something other than a stegosaur.
Ah, the joys of using the web as a primary resource... :-S
> Wuerhosaurus was once considered as young as Albian. I also note
> stegosaurs seem extirpated by the Barremian in America.
In answer to your question, though, Wuerhosaurus was once considered to be
the latest-occuring stegosaur, but new (as you note) new data indicate that
it could be older than the Wealden stegosaur material.
But is Wealden stegosaur material e.g. the Craterosaurus fragment,
reworked? Also is the age of the Wealden well known? Is it Hauterivian or
could it range frm Berriasian to Barremian?
The Katsuya material
may, or may not, be stegosaur, but (as with its morphology) its
is not yet published. (Early Cretaceous units in Japan represent quite a
chunk of time).
So (depending on the precise age of Wuerhosaurus), either that Asian form
the Wealden taxa or the problematic (age and morphology) Monokosaurus of
Tibet or various possibly stegosaurian trackways may be the youngest known
indication of Stegosauria.
I once read that the unit that yielded Malawisaurus also yielded
stegosaur material. When I asked about the age of this unit, somebody
mentioned 115 Ma, if he remembred what Jacobs told him correctly. 115 Ma
would be much younger than Paranthodon or any other definite stegosaur.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: email@example.com
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: