[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: No Cretaceous rainforests?
In a message dated 6/29/02 6:41:58 AM Eastern Daylight Time, StephanPickering@cs.com writes:
<< To infer, as the new paper does, that rainforests did not exist is ludicrous. >>
If I'm not mistaken, the new paper is referring to angiosperm rainforests. I'd hesitate to characterize Kirk Johnson's conclusions as "ludicrous". DV