[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: New theropod phylogenetics paper :-)

On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Williams, Tim wrote:

> >The only way you can get around this is to cladistic redefine Reptilia,
> >and that is exactly what strict cladists have been doing for years, and
> >they can't even decide among themselves which of their warped definitions
> >should be adopted.
> It's funny you mentioned "warped definitions". [snipped]

It's also funny that there is only ONE phylogenetic definition of
_Reptilia_, namely Clade(_Crocodylia_ + _Lepidosauria_ + _Testudines_).
With so many clades that could be validly criticized for having multiple
definitions in usage, why pick this _Reptilia_, which has only one?

 The Dinosauricon        <http://dinosauricon.com>
  BloodySteak             <http://www.bloodysteak.com>
   personal                <keesey@bigfoot.com> --> <tmk@dinosauricon.com>
    Dinosauricon-related    <dinosaur@dinosauricon.com>
     AOL Instant Messenger   <Ric Blayze>
      ICQ                     <77314901>
       Yahoo! Messenger        <Mighty Odinn>