[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Giraffatit[a]n brancai Vs Brachiosaurus brancai Vs Brachiosaurus altithorax
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Kinman" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:03 AM
> With these differences, plus the fact that they are from different
> continents, I favor recognizing them as two distinct genera. But deciding
> between generic and subgeneric status is often a matter of taste (and
> choice can be justified).
Why not just say "it's _always_ a matter of taste"? :-) Anyway,
http://dinosauricon.com/genera/giraffatitan.html says *Brachiosaurus* and
*Giraffatitan* have no synapomorphies, so uniting them and nothing else in a
genus might not be a good idea.
> If one wants to follow a safer, more conservative path,
Why should a more conservative path be safer???