[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Oldest Neoceratopsian...



    While I appreciate the link Dan has provided, is it fair (EVEN IF IN
JEST) to prefix the link with, "...Or Skrepnick Strikes Again:'?

    If the evidence is sufficient for nature to accept, I question whether
such a prejudicial prefix can justifiably be added before the link.

    Does anyone of you out there (Dan included) have one figurative
micro-gram of evidence that we are again beholding a chimera?  I seriously
doubt that to be the case.

    Ray Stanford

"You know my method.  It is founded upon the observance of trifles." --
Sherlock Holmes in The Boscombe Valley Mystery
----- Original Message -----
From: <Danvarner@aol.com>
To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: Oldest Neoceratopsian...


       ...Or Skrepnick Strikes Again:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/03/0319_0320_ceratops.html

       DV