[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Oldest Neoceratopsian...



Ah, I thought Dan was referring to the accompanying picture drawn by Mr.
Skrepnick...


Mike D.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On Behalf Of
> Ray Stanford
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:45 PM
> To: Danvarner@aol.com; dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Re: Oldest Neoceratopsian...
>
>
>     While I appreciate the link Dan has provided, is it fair (EVEN IF IN
> JEST) to prefix the link with, "...Or Skrepnick Strikes Again:'?
>
>     If the evidence is sufficient for nature to accept, I question whether
> such a prejudicial prefix can justifiably be added before the link.
>
>     Does anyone of you out there (Dan included) have one figurative
> micro-gram of evidence that we are again beholding a chimera?  I seriously
> doubt that to be the case.
>
>     Ray Stanford
>
> "You know my method.  It is founded upon the observance of trifles." --
> Sherlock Holmes in The Boscombe Valley Mystery
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Danvarner@aol.com>
> To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:41 PM
> Subject: Oldest Neoceratopsian...
>
>
>        ...Or Skrepnick Strikes Again:
> http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/03/0319_0320_ceratops.html
>
>        DV
>