[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Liaoceratops yanzigouensis gen. et sp. nov.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Williams, Tim wrote:
> _Liaoceratops_ is regarded as a neoceratopsian by Xu et al.; however, I am
> not aware if this clade has been defined using anchor taxa.
I always thought it was Clade(_Ceratopsidae_ <-- _Psittacosaurus_), but
I'm not sure who defined it.
> Clade 2 - would this be called Ceratopsoidea?
Sadly, yes. IIRC, _Ceratopsoidea_ = Clade(_Montanoceratops_ +
_Ceratopsidae_) or some such. Having _Ceratopsomorpha_ inside this is
rather distasteful, and this was based on the now outmoded idea that
_Montanoceratops_ was close to ceratopsids. Maybe this should be revised
prior to PhyloCode.
> Clade 3 - would this be Coronosauria?
As I understand it, yes. (Clade(_Ceratopsidae_ + _Protoceratops_), right?)
> Clade 4 - would this be Ceratopsomorpha?
Also yes, as I understand it. (Clade(_Zuniceratops_ + _Ceratopsidae_))
- T. MICHAEL KEESEY > tmk @ dinosauricon . com ++++++++++++++ AIM: Ric Blayze
The Dinosauricon => www.dinosauricon.com === dinosaur info and illustration
BloodySteak ======> www.bloodysteak.com ================= artistic showcase