[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Theropod limbs - how mobile?
From: John Conway <email@example.com>
Date: Thu May 16, 2002 01:35:44 PM Australia/Sydney
Subject: Re: Theropod limbs - how mobile?
On Thursday, May 16, 2002, at 08:46 AM, Steven Coombs wrote:
True, its [T.rex} hands are pretty well useless, but I wouldn't say
they were capable of doing nothing. After all if its arms are estimated
to lift 300+ LBS. If it was helping to lift its upper body (not all the
help from its arms) or to cling on a carcass or to even cling onto a
female during mating, its hands had to be used for something.
300 LBS = ?150 Kgs. Impressive as that is in human terms, it is weak in
T.rex terms. T.rex's would weigh between four and eight tonnes
(depending on the estimate and the individual); when it moved or stood
up we are looking at many tonnes of force, not kilograms (or LBS). I
can't see T.rex's arms being used to hold a female during mating, they
would be ripped off. As for gripping carcasses, why? Why would it want
to hold a carcass to it's chest? Even if it did, it could only hold
relatively small chunks, because again, it's prey were also multi-tonne
Is it possible that the heavy musculature on tyrannosaurid arms was
simply retained from ancestors, and didn't serve any function?
On Thursday, May 16, 2002, at 05:56 AM, Williams, Tim wrote:
For an obligately bipedal carnivore like _Deinonychus_ I'm open to
alternative suggestions for why it had strong forelimbs.
Perhaps because it was neoflightless?
John Conway, Palaeoartist
"All art is quite useless." - Oscar Wilde
Systematic ramblings: http://homepage.mac.com/john_conway/phylogenetic/