[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Pachyrhinosaur nasal horn? (was RE: OMEISAUR CLUBS, PACHYRHINOSAUR)
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:30 AM
Subject: RE: Pachyrhinosaur nasal horn? (was RE: OMEISAUR CLUBS,
Tracy Ford wrote:
> The keratin on the beak of birds and their feathers are formed
> differently. Don't fall into the trap of them being both keratin they
> are exactly the same.
Not 'exactly the same' at all, I agree. But if birds can build hard
supracranial structures out of epidermal tissue, I can't see why dinosaurs
couldn't. For example, the casque of adult cassowaries is constructed of a
bony base or core underneath a keratinous structure. However, the keratin
casque may *double* the height of the underlying bone, and the keratinous
structure does not necessarily conform to the shape of the bone buried
But it is using the bone as a template.
>>No doubt the pachyostatic boss of pachyrhinosaurs was sheathed in horn.<<
No doubt at all, your are correct.
>>What this debate boils down to is what shape this horny layer took: did it
faithfully conform to the shape of the underlying bone (mostly blunt and
rounded at the top), or was it extended dorsally into a more apical, conical
structure (mimicking the bony horn cores of other ceratopsids). Or
something between these two extremes.<<
IMHO it was more rounded and boss shaped and not extended like a horn.
>>David asked why a keratinous horn would be an advantage over a bony horn.
can think of one possible explanation: pain. A keratinous horn is less
painful when broken. <<
Or when hit. Now, I find it interesting that the frill of Triceratops (the
bone texture, groves etc) look exactly the same as the oribital horns. Was
there a horny sheath on the frill also? Or no horny sheath over the horns?
Timothy J. Williams, Ph.D.
Tracy L. Ford
P. O. Box 1171
Poway Ca 92074