[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
In a message dated 11/4/02 2:46:18 AM EST, email@example.com writes:
<< *A. wichmannianus*'s dentary in resemblance to this, they would be
There's a small problem with classifying Antarctosaurus as a rebbachisaurid.
Antarctosauridae Olshevsky, 1978 has priority over Rebbachisauridae, which
was created much more recently (don't recall citation/reference off top of
head; Sereno? Wilson & Sereno?). And if one classifies Antarctosaurus as a
"titanosaurid," a family name based on a nomen dubium, then one needs to
choose the next available family name for Titanosauridae, which would be,
guess what--Antarctosauridae Olshevsky, 1978.