[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: synonymous sauropods?
Tim Donovan wrote:
> The recent discovery of tracks which match the pes of O. skarzynskii in
> the Central Sayr, close to the site that yielded the type skull of N.
> mongoliensis, suggests the two are the same. So does the discovery of
> opisthocoelous caudals in the nearby Western Sayr.
The mooted synonymy of _Nemegtosaurus_ and _Opisthocoelicaudia_ is looking
increasingly promising. After all, the two genera do pop up in the same
part of the titanosaur tree.
However... until overlapping material comes to light that *proves* the two
genera are one and the same, I believe it's premature to synonymize
_Opisthocoelicaudia_ with _Nemegtosaurus_. It is possible that two
titanosaur genera existed in the same place at the same time - as happened
in Madagascar, India and South America during the Late Cretaceous. (Maybe
North America too - depending on the provenance of the sauropod material
referred to _Alamosaurus_.) After all, by the end of the Cretaceous
(Campanian/Maastrichtian), genera belonging to the Titanosauria appear to be
the only sauropods left.