[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
IIRC someone recently wrote that T. efremovi was valid and distinct from
T. bataar owing to lack of an extension of the postorbital into the orbit in
the former. I note in the largest specimen after the type, the postorbital
is partly lost, and its anterior extension is restored with a dotted line.
Isn't its apparent absence therefore an artifact?
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*