[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

T. efremovi

IIRC someone recently wrote that T. efremovi was valid and distinct from T. bataar owing to lack of an extension of the postorbital into the orbit in the former. I note in the largest specimen after the type, the postorbital is partly lost, and its anterior extension is restored with a dotted line. Isn't its apparent absence therefore an artifact?

The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail