[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Forthcoming theropod paper of note on the manus
--- Aspidel <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> From: "Nick Gardner"
> > It seems unlikely if Eoraptor lunensis and the herrerasaurids are
> > but I recall in the SVP abstracts from 2001 that they might not be.
> What could they be if they aren't theropods? Basal dinosaurs, more basals
> than any theropod? Protodinosaurs as _Marasuchus_?
It has been proposed that they are non-dinosaurian dinosauriforms, closer to
dinosaurs than _Marasuchus_ and _Pseudolagosuchus_, but, unless I'm mistaken,
it now seems to be more popular to regard them as basal saurischians, outside
Sauropodomorpha and Theropoda.
=====> T. Michael Keesey <email@example.com>
=====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
=====> BloodySteak <http://bloodysteak.com>
=====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus ? Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
- Site update
- From: Brett Booth <firstname.lastname@example.org>