[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Details on SVP 2002 Part 1



--- Aegyptiacus@aol.com wrote:
> I said :
>  (I think there was the same kind of question for the first amniote in 
> the DML archives, which was there first : anapsid or synapsid)? 
> 
> Of course I meant Sauropsid or Theropsid

Researchers seem to be favoring "synapsid" over "theropsid". Of course, being
sister groups by definition, both _Synapsida_ and _Sauropsida_ would have
appeared at the same time, when the ancestral amniote (sensu stricto) lineage
split into two.

=====
=====> T. Michael Keesey <keesey@bigfoot.com>
=====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
=====> BloodySteak <http://bloodysteak.com>
=====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
=====

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com