[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Details on SVP 2002 Part 1
--- Aegyptiacus@aol.com wrote:
> I said :
> (I think there was the same kind of question for the first amniote in
> the DML archives, which was there first : anapsid or synapsid)?
> Of course I meant Sauropsid or Theropsid
Researchers seem to be favoring "synapsid" over "theropsid". Of course, being
sister groups by definition, both _Synapsida_ and _Sauropsida_ would have
appeared at the same time, when the ancestral amniote (sensu stricto) lineage
split into two.
=====> T. Michael Keesey <email@example.com>
=====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
=====> BloodySteak <http://bloodysteak.com>
=====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More