[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: A couple of questions
> 1) What's the difference between Citipati osmolskae & Oviraptor
> philoceratops? Seriously, to me they both look identical.
That's because all the pictures you've seen of "_Oviraptor philoceratops_"
really specimens of _Citipati osmolskae_. I'm not sure whether any real _O.
philoceratops_ are known besides the type specimen. A restoration of the
holotype of _O._ by HP Marco Auditore can be seen here:
WHOAH... So does that mean that all the other specimens of "Oviraptor
philoceratops" (including the brooding specimen, the Romeo & Juliet
specimens featured on National Geographic etc etc) are all really
Citipati??? So that means that a lot of paleo artists & sculptors have been
restoring Citipati instead of Oviraptor!!! Then in that case how would the
'real' O. philoceratops have looked like???
> And while we're at
> that, in what way does Khaan differ from Ingenia?
Off the top of my head, _K._ lacks _I._'s odd finger proportions (I longest,
then II, then III).
So Khaan has the 'normal' finger proportions of the other maniraptors??
Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free! Try MSN.