[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Peering at review

George Olshevsky (Dinogeorge@aol.com) wrote:

<I'm not even talking about explosive speciation, I'm talking about, say,
the  number of species that stand between a group and its nearest sister
group.  There's only one species of aardvark (afaik), but to get to the
aardvark from  its closest relative demands a few dozen species as
"missing links.">

  Under what paradigm would a few dozen species be required to link an
aardvark to any other afrothere? (Assuming it's an afrothere.) For one
thing, primitive hyracoids and aardvarks all look similar; go up to
tethytheres, and you get short-legged, tailed, stubby animals with long
bodies, and internal genitalia for males, something all afrotheres share.
Terrestrial desmostylians and sirenians, as well as primitive elephants
are very, very, very similar to one another. These features all show that
the well-spring from which afrotheres sprung was a smallish, aardvark-like
toothy terrestrial animal, most probably Gondwanan, with a large head,
hooves, well-muscles tail, and stocky torso/trunk.

  It's not a matter of looking at end products, or living animals, but at
fossils and the primitive condition, something I've been advocating for
years on this list.


Jaime A. Headden

  Little steps are often the hardest to take.  We are too used to making leaps 
in the face of adversity, that a simple skip is so hard to do.  We should all 
learn to walk soft, walk small, see the world around us rather than zoom by it.

Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site