[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Who says dromaeosaurs can't fly?
At 10:43 PM 12/09/02 -0400, GSP1954@aol.com wrote:
Steve may be polemical about it but so what, because he is correct that the
cladistic cult - in which a methodology that is a merely one of a set of
phylogenetic tools has widely been taken to be to the only legitimate means
of restoring phylogeney - has been dealt a grevious and well deserved blow.
It is now up to the cladists to try to explain how the methodology managed to
ignore or deny the excellent evidence for dinosaurian neoflightlessness for
Umm - I still don't see this. All cladistics does is produce a
phylogenetic tree based on coded characters. It says absolutely nothing
about when, or how many times, flight evolved. I don't see why you need to
change the cladistically-derived tree at all based on flight or non-flight,
as long as you are willing to assume that flight evolved within the
maniraptorian complex more than once, or that it evolved more basally on
the tree and was lost several times in the various cladistic
branches. Where is the contradiction?
Ronald I. Orenstein Phone: (905) 820-7886
International Wildlife Coalition Fax/Modem: (905) 569-0116
1825 Shady Creek Court
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 3W2 mailto:email@example.com